Links of Interest for January 28, 2018

Links of Interest for January 28, 2018

Michael Shermer, For the Love of Science: “That liberals are just as guilty of antiscience bias comports more with accounts of humans chomping canines, and yet those on the left are just as skeptical of well-established science when findings clash with their political ideologies, such as with GMOs, nuclear power, genetic engineering and evolutionary psychology—skepticism of the last I call “cognitive creationism” for its endorsement of a blank-slate model of the mind in which natural selection operated on humans only from the neck down.” 

Links of Interest for January 2, 2018

Links of Interest for January 2, 2018

“After you have exhausted what there is in business, politics, conviviality, love, and so on — have found that none of these finally satisfy, or permanently wear — what remains? Nature remains; to bring out from their torpid recesses, the affinities of a man or woman with the open air, the trees, fields, the changes of seasons — the sun by day and the stars of heaven by night.” — Walt Whitman

Links of Interest for December 12, 2017

Links of Interest for December 12, 2017

“I believe in Spinoza’s God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.” In this way, Einstein was unifying science and religion, and referred to himself as a “deeply religious nonbeliever. Moreover, being open-minded and inclusive in his worldview, he found Jesus, Buddha, and Moses equally compelling as prophets.”

Thoughts on Black Religion

Thoughts on Black Religion

On Monday, December 4, 2017, I hosted a showing of the documentary Contradiction, by Black atheist Jeremiah Camara. I appeared in the 2014 documentary that deals with theism – primarily Christianity – in the Black community. The film was very well-received and there was a lively discussion that followed. Most of those in attendance were theists and two Afrocentric individuals had some defenses of theism. One man, a local college instructor, made several comments.

Speaking with Historical Figures

Speaking with Historical Figures

It is a fascinating exercise to decide to whom we would speak if we had the opportunity to speak with anyone from history. First, I must state that I would have no interest whatsoever in speaking with Jesus Christ. I do not believe that he was the Son of God or even a particularly interesting or brilliant moral leader. The first person from history that I would like to speak with would be Malcolm X. I would ask him what he thinks of the Nation of Islam since Minister Louis Farrakhan assumed power. I would like to get his views on women’s rights and LGBTQI rights. I would like to know what he thought of Obama’s Presidency. I would be interested in getting his views on rap music and hip- hop culture. I would like to get his views on humanism among people of African descent. I would like to get his views on the relationship between the individual and society. And there are many others I’d want to speak to, too. . .

Monuments and Their Messages

Monuments and Their Messages

Today there is much controversy surrounding monuments to historical figures with problematic histories. This problem has been best exemplified with monuments established to honor Southern civil war “heroes.” Somewhat less controversial are monuments to former slave owners such as Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, and explorers such as Christopher Columbus who helped bring about many deaths to First Nation Peoples.

Dick Gregory: The Greatest Black Conspiracy Theorist of All

Dick Gregory: The Greatest Black Conspiracy Theorist of All

However, Gregory rarely met a conspiracy theory he did not like. Indeed, the only ones he seemed to reject were those involving the Illuminati (based on anti- Jewish bigotry) and those involving extraterrestrial aliens (thank goodness!). Gregory really became unhinged with the idea that the infamous Atlanta child murders from 1979-1981 were part of a massive conspiracy. My former colleague, Joe Nickell of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry did a great deal of research on that case. He found that the evidence against the convicted African American murderer Wayne Williams was overwhelming. There was an eyewitness that saw Williams holding hands with one of the victims. Furthermore, the forensic evidence was solid. There were unique carpet fibers connecting Williams to the murders, for example. Williams was convicted by a jury of eight Blacks and four Whites. (Had the jury been all White, the conspiracy theory would have raged out of control.)

A Socratic Dialogue with the Almighty God

A Socratic Dialogue with the Almighty God

Recently, a religious friend of mine shared a Facebook posting about an imaginary dialogue between a disgruntled believer and God. The believer was complaining that God did not wake him up on time and apparently failed him in many other ways. However, as it turned out, God was actually steering the believer away from many problems of which the believer was simply unaware. In the end, God tells the believer to believe in the plan He has set for him. It is a warm, fuzzy story, indeed.

However, I would like to imagine such a dialogue from the viewpoint of a well-meaning humanist. Here it goes:

Are Women and Men Exactly the Same? — A Book Review

Are Women and Men Exactly the Same? — A Book Review

Progressive readers of this book should always strive to keep an open mind. When I started to read it, I thought that it would be just another conservative or reactionary defense of patriarchal thinking. After all, the author puts “climate change deniers” in scare quotes (p. 42) and implies that climate change is not a reality. However, as one continues to read, she can see that the author’s well- researched book is thought-provoking and generally fair.

Giving Theists All They Can Handle — A Book Review

Giving Theists All They Can Handle — A Book Review

David Silverman is the hyper-aggressive, abrasive, arrogant and antagonistic president of American Atheists. He constantly whines about alleged political correctness and always complains that many people – even other atheists – call him “a dick,” which he vehemently but unconvincingly denies. Silverman is of the opinion that atheists should disrespect theism without disrespecting theists. His view is reminiscent of the idea that Christians should love the sin and hate the sinner. The problem is that hating the sin looks very much like hating the sinner to most people. Similarly, Silverman often makes cringe-inducing statements that many theists find unacceptably insulting.

Is the Bible REALLY From God?

Is the Bible REALLY From God?

The title of this column comes from the title of a pamphlet (Awake!) from the Jehovah’s Witnesses (JWs). On page 3 of the pamphlet, it is pointed out that the Bible is composed of 66 books, “which were written by some 40 writers over a period of about 1,600 years.” The JWs, though, believe that these writers were inspired by God. However, why would God not write the Bible himself, considering its supposed importance to all of humanity? In any case, the JWs say “This can be likened to a businessman dictating a letter to his secretary.” (Note the quaint sexism in the analogy.) The problem is that businessmen and secretaries (or administrative assistants) actually exist. More importantly, both are fallible.

Evolution: Still Terrifying Religionists After All These Years

Evolution: Still Terrifying Religionists After All These Years

Turkey has made international headlines by deciding that the theory of natural selection may no longer be taught in the nation’s schools. Numan Kurtulmus, the country’s deputy prime minister, an economics professor and an influential member of the nation’s leading political party, called the well-established theory “outdated and rotten.” Furthermore, he expressed the idea that schoolchildren do not have the critical thinking skills to handle such an idea that challenges their deeply cherished religious worldview.

Humanism for Head and Heart — A Book Review

Humanism for Head and Heart — A Book Review

This book is subtitled, “Rewriting the Ten Commandments for the Twenty-first Century.” These two humanists are not the first to re-write the Ten Commandments. However, like probably all of the others before them, they greatly improve upon the “original” ten, which is extremely easy to do. Lex Bayer is on the board of the Humanist Connection, a group that reaches out to Stanford University and Silicon Valley. John Figdor is a humanist chaplain at Stanford. Like many other atheists, they believe it is not enough to simply reject a belief in God. Atheists, they contend, should become humanists and have something to live for. They can learn to live ethical and happy lives.