Volume 1 Number 1

Religion and the Human Prospect

Religion and the Human Prospect

Paul Kurtz has written that a modern ethical system cannot begin with the acceptance of the rule ethics of the ancient religious systems of the world. Not only people who regard themselves as “secular” accept this principle. Many people who regard themselves as religious believe this as well. The laws and commandments of the world’s religions, and especially the monotheistic traditions, are of immense historical importance in helping us to understand the slow progression of ethical thought from simple assent to critical examination over the greater part of three millennia, corresponding to the transition between relatively simple ancient societies to complex ones. The same period witnessed the growth of philosophy, literacy, new forms of self-expression, changing attitudes toward prosperity and government, and above all, in the last two hundred years, the rapid growth of science and technology as a new paradigm for understanding the world and our place in it. To assume that the rules that held together ancient desert and agricultural groups are adequate to address the dilemmas and problems of the last two millennia is an assumption that critical examination does not support.

If God Is Dead, What Comes Next?

If God Is Dead, What Comes Next?

Let’s say Richard Dawkins and his compatriots are right: there is no God. Is that it? End of story? Unfortunately, no. Even if the so-called “New Atheists” are right, and all that’s left of God is a chalk outline, that’s far from the end of the story. Sadly, religion can’t simply be surgically extracted from our lives, our culture and our society that easily. God’s absence leaves a sizable void that needs to be filled by something. And atheism isn’t it.

Neuroethics: Traditions, Tasks, and Value

Neuroethics: Traditions, Tasks, and Value

Historically, a number of scientific, fields, endeavors, and trends have shaped both the worldview(s) of the time – and those of today. Over the past twenty years, neuroscience has assumed a progressively prominent role in this regard, and there is a vibrant — and I believe defensible — sentiment, that the brain represents the “next frontier” of scientific exploration and discovery.